Archive Page 25

Learning from Baudrillard and Foucault: Consumer Culture, Social Milieus and the Governmentality of Lifestyle

At the ISPP 31st Annual Conference in Paris, 09.-12.-07.2008, I will present a theoretical framework based on Foucault and Baudrillard which hopefully offers inspiring insight into what by some authors is called „postmodern consumer society“. The aim is bringing together Jean Baudrillards early and groundbreaking analysis of Consumer Culture (first published in 1970) with Michel Foucaults concept of neoliberal Governmentality in a concept of what I call the „Governmentality of Lifestyle“.

Combining Foucault’s concept of neoliberal governmentality, Baudrillard’s analysis of consumer culture and developments in market research etc., one can see new kinds of power relations evolve within and across societies. Governmentality of lifestyle is the pattern of interindividual and intergroup power relations. Especially political and psychological research has to be done to trace the impacts of such a new power relations on individuals as well as on societies.

Consumer Culture unfolds to full scale. Today, signs and not the good behind the signs are the most important selling factors. The style of everyday life becomes a powerful means of creating identity and social affiliation in postmodern societies. Social Milieus – large groups of people not only sharing patterns of modern stratification, but also interests, consumer patterns, and even styles of arranging personal relationships – shape postmodern societies, which are characterized by lifestyle-driven segmentation patterns.

Social Milieus also became one of the most powerful means to identify target groups in todays market-research. Data are captured by research, bonus programms and creditcards and . This development goes far beyond the dicussions referring to the protection of data privacy and surveillance, as such techniques are already implemented and, of course, used to create transparent consumers. Taken together, all these developments form a complex of power relations of the Governmentality of Lifestyle.

Lifestyle, Consumer Culture, and Trendspotting

I am really glad that the ISPP section chairs for new theoretical and methodological developments have accepted both of my paper proposals. I am looking forward to it – not only because the conference is held at Paris but also because of the possibility to discuss some of the stuff I think is belonging to my better ones. Short abstracts of both papers will be posted in an instant.

It turned out that the topics – Consumer Culture, Social Milieus and the Governmentality of Lifestyle – are hot. One could have thought that the ideas of a wired mind in its tower of science are a little bit less close to reality. Then I read an advertisment in “Spiegel online” about the 13th German Trend Day.

To my surprise i read about things that sounded familiar to me: The Economy of Attention is dead, so they say. In the eyes of the authors – obviously concerned with market and trend research – the future is social recognition, because we all are social creatures, want to be liked, respected and loved. Therefore, they say, we need the applause of our self chosen relatives to secure our status. This includes the shift from the former main question “Who am I?” to the new one: “Who do I want to be?” in an age of dynamic identity engineering. Very interesting though. First thing I thought was: Ok. Thats not new for me. But then I became aware that I seemed to have detected a real development in real life that shapes the future of our societies. One more reason to discuss this all.

Call for Papers: Macht ist überall – Foucault and Beyond!

Unter dem vorläufigen Titel “Macht ist überall” bereite ich eine Print-Sammelpublikation zu Ansätzen und Weiterentwicklungen basierend Michel Foucaults Konzepten der Analytik der Macht, der Gouvernementalität etc. vor. Basis dieser Publikation sind studentische Aufsätze, die aus meinem Foucault-Seminar im Sommersemester 2007 hervorgegangen sind und einen peer-review-Prozes s durchlaufen.  In diesem Rahmen sind weitere Manuskripte erwünscht, die sich mit Foucault beschäftigen. Bei Interesse schickt mir bitte ein Paper-Proposal. Aufsätze sollten nicht länger als 7000 Wörter.

Based on Papers written in the context of a Foucault-Seminar in Summer 2007, I am planning an edited and peer-reviewed volume of these students’ papers. If you are working on Foucault,  or beyond Foucault, you are invited to  submit a paper  proposal (up to  1000 words). This will be reviewed, and if acepted, you may submit your paper (up to 7000 words). Publication language is German.

Submission Deadline: March 25th, 2008

Please contact me via e-mail.

Legal Notice: This Call for Papers does not content any publication contract or obligations neither from my side nor any other!!!!!

Quelle Surprise – it’s Medvedjev!

As 99,73% of votes are proceeded – some call it counted – by now, one can hardly imagine that there will be any change in the results: Political engineering and Image making in Russia, whether legal or not, has provided 70,24% victory to Dmitrij Medvedjev in the presidential elections. The result is not really surprising. More important is the fact that voter turnout (about 69%) was considerably higher than in the 2004 elections.

This might be valued as a strong legitimation for Medvedjev. But this also means that out of the about 109 Million eligible voters, only 48% voted for Medvedjev, while 30%+ didn’t vote at all and the rest selected another candidate. What this fact really indicates is that the candidates were able to mobilize their following. Taking into account theb results of political opinion research the results of nationalist Zhirinovski (9,36%) and communist Zyuganov (17,75%) come very close to their real potential. Most of the non-voter then seem to have withdrawn from politics because of the predictable outcomes.

But will there be a new direction of russian politics? We strongly disbelieve the moderate optimism in western politics. The designated president stated that he will – together with a Prime Minister Putin – continue the work of his predecessor. Even if there will be no new distribution of power between those two institutions (as Medvedjev indicated today), the influence of the Prime Minister will probably stay rather high. And, by the way, as all pc-owners, might know: never change a running system. For Russia the current configuration of the clearly authoritarian political system seems to run pretty well.

But it is much too early to give an in-depth analysis, even though many journalists and even political scientists will come up with such in the next few days and weeks. In our opinion, one at least has to a 100-day period to get a closer idea of what path of development Russia will chose in the Future.

Russian presidential elections

There are elections going on in Russia at the moment. Considering the developments in the political system of Russia in the last few years, they cannot be called democratic in any way. They seem to be part of the emerging so called “russian way to postmodernism”, that is openly authoritarian. Elections and electoral engineering are part of a complex system of electoral authoritarianism (Schedler) that evolved under Putins regency and reduced elections to plebiscitarian functions. As his close ally Dmitrij Medvedjew is supposed to be the winner of the elections, there are signs that this system will be stabilized and last for at least the next electoral term.

Kopfmaennchen are closely observing the elections and will come up with an in-depth analysis later this year. In Addition we hope to be able to provide a short analysis in the next few days.


Categories